Corporate Transparency in a No-Fact-Checking Era

Hosted by

Samuel Smith

Samuel Smith

Manager

View full profile
Casey Hernandez

Casey Hernandez

Partner

View full profile
09.03.25

The media landscape changes by the day, and now both human- and AI-generated content are fueling misinformation and disinformation. For communicators, the job is clear: protect your company’s reputation, and that starts with trust.

Misinformation is false and shared without intent to mislead, while disinformation is deliberatively deceptive. Both can damage corporate reputations, erode trust and even move markets. 

How Misinformation Spreads

Misinformation can spread rapidly. Like a virus, it can infect seemingly healthy hosts––social media, blogs, conversations and even reputable news outlets. Influencers, podcasters and Substackers have created valuable new channels to reach audiences, but bad actors can exploit these channels too. With enough momentum, misinformation can go “viral” ––causing a very real crisis for communicators. 

In many cases, misinformation sticks because it feels true, even if it isn’t. If an organization has already earned a strong reputation for transparency and truthfulness, misinformation will be easier to diffuse. 

Preventing Misinformation

Transparency is key—if you want people to trust you, be upfront. When businesses hide or cover up scandals and unsavory news events, it usually does more damage than the original problem. 

Transparency doesn’t mean abandoning privacy. People still expect companies to protect data and act responsibly. What it does mean is staying ahead of the story—communicating openly with employees, customers, investors, regulators, and your community. And when the news isn’t great, it’s better coming from you. Being up front about an issue with an internal email, statement or interview ensures your organization’s message is out there early and shows you can be trusted.

Consider layoffs: denying rumors may ease short-term pressure, but if the layoffs occur, reputational damage compounds. Addressing the issue candidly may draw attention in the moment, but it ultimately builds long-term credibility.

Countering Misinformation

Unfortunately for communicators, transparency and a strong reputation are not always enough to combat misinformation. When this happens, addressing misinformation becomes more focused and granular. Speed, clarity and truthfulness are essential to pushing back against a misinformation campaign. 

Misinformation campaigns must be addressed in a timely manner. The longer misinformation goes unchecked, the more it can spread and the stronger of a hold it can take on the public. Monitoring and social listening tools, increasingly powered by AI, are indispensable for spotting misinformation early. Proactive detection allows communications teams to choose their response before a false narrative spirals into a crisis.

 Clarity is essential at every level. Confirm what is true, correct what is false, and, wherever possible, provide evidence—data, visuals, or third-party validators. Simply denying a claim pits your word against rumor; evidence wins every time. 

Being honest is the most essential element to counter misinformation. Failing to be truthful while working to counter misinformation can undermine an entire effort to refute false claims and create a new crisis. Covering up bad news in an attempt to stop misinformation weakens a company’s reputation and threatens its ability to counter misinformation in the future. 

Key Takeaways

The avenues and sources of misinformation and disinformation are changing, but the fix isn’t new: trust, transparency and truth. A strong reputation is the best defense, regular monitoring is the best early warning system, and clarity and honesty are the best tools for a response. 

Hosted by

Samuel Smith

Samuel Smith

Manager

View full profile
Casey Hernandez

Casey Hernandez

Partner

View full profile